User Reviews (1 - 11 of 19)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

Not a major upgrade from the previous version.

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 12 / 13
Date: April 28, 2000
Author: Amazon User

It would seem as though the folks at Wizbang (the developers of the title in question) were quite busy basking in the success of Baseball 2000, because they didn't spend much time improving it for the new year.

The first thing I do with any baseball game is create a player with my own name, crank up all of the stats to their maximum levels, and then go have a 4 home run game against Pedro Martinez. Typically this is accomplished via a ratings system. Baseball 2001's greatest new feature in my opinion is the ability to define and edit players based on actual statistics, rather than ratings. Instead of saying player x has a power rating of 99, you can say player x hit 74 home runs last year. This allows much more control for the statistics engine of the game to work with.

The feature, which is reminiscent of the Tony LaRussa baseball series of the early 90s (which was the best graphical baseball simulation ever in my humble opinion) is about all that is new in the game.

I honestly cannot see any difference in the graphics engine. The players (some of which have actual rendered faces) look very much the same; aside from some improvements in the stadium details, the game is graphically identical to BB2000.

More frustrating is the fact that the game is very buggy, and the same bugs that annoyed me in BB2000 have reappeared in the new version. For example, a common problem is a batter which steps up to the plate standing on the plate and gets hit every time! The game freezes at least once for every 3-4 games that I play. The extra task of having to save the game every 1/2 innning is very frustrating, and the crashes require a full reboot of the sytem.

I would not recommend this game to anybody that already owns the 2000 version, as it is much the same.

1 of best baseball simulators

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 8 / 9
Date: April 18, 2001
Author: Amazon User

In Baseball 2001 you can enjoy straight out baseball unlike the triple play series. TP2001 and Triple Play are much more advanced in features such as unique batting stances and player faces but it lacks realistic gameplay. Baseball 2001 doesn't include loud explotion when a homerun is hit and the commentary is much less repetitive. Microsoft Baseball is one of the few pc baseball games where you control where you swing. This makes the game more challenging and keeps you interested in the game. Although if you do not like this setting you can turn it off. The stadiums are amazing in this game but the players don't compare to TPB or High Heat 2002. When managing a season player trades and free agents are much more realistic because you have certain money that you make. If you want true gameplay and don't mind giving up a little for graphics by this, but if you want unrealistic arcade games go with the triple play series.

P.S.-The rosters aren't nearly as updated as High Heat 2002 or even Triple Play, but in the 2000 game you can update your rosters at Microsoft.

How to Beat Bill Gates and Win the World Series!!!

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 11 / 16
Date: October 19, 2000
Author: Amazon User

I beat the Cleveland Indians four straight last year in the World Series (yes, I played 162 games). I was a Rookie. This year it was time to step up. The pitching is veteran but the batting is still rookie. The Dodgers, once again, are the best team in the major leagues.

Throw every pitch with a "power pitch". When your pitcher is down to 0% in health, immediately get him out of there and put in a relief pitcher who has the highest health rating. If they are all the same, put in the relief pitcher with the best ERA for last season (real life). You will have to check these. Pitch the ball down the middle each time. Learn to pitch a new kind of pitch everytime. 1,2,3,4,1,2, and so forth. Remove your relief pitcher immediately when he gets down to 0%. In batting, the power hit everytime. One exception. If the player is doing really badly, go to the normal swing. Never swing on a 3-0 pitch. Always swing on "line" pitches (those pitches on the white line) because of the "pull". Also swing on balls inside the rectangle.

Don't bother with "Triple Play". Fun and cute. But really for 10-year olds. I found "High Heat Baseball" to be crummy. But it might require a play station to be really good.

Buy the game if you love baseball. I pitched a no-hitter in little league and went 3 for 4. The newspaper reported it but referred to me as "Billy Butterfly". Ouch!

Could be better

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 8 / 10
Date: August 16, 2000
Author: Amazon User

This was the first baseball sim game I've bought since Tony LaRussa 1996 edition. When Tony 96 came out, it was well ahead of its time, stats galore, from monthly breakdowns and head to head match ups. Even the graphics were good. With Microsoft advertising its mogul feature, I figured that this game would be great. I was way off. Simulation is almost ridiculous, outscoring opponents 14-0 every game gets boring, not enough stat tracking to keep me happy, can't preview line up before game time for managers who like to platoon players. On the other hand, Graphics and commentary are above average. If you are a baseball fan who isn't into the managing aspect of a game, this game is for you. But a realism geek like myself was very disapointed. High Heat Baseball 2001 is infinite times better.

Good gameplay for serious gamers, bad stats for stat freaks.

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 6 / 7
Date: May 26, 2000
Author: Amazon User

The last baseball sim I had was FPS: Baseball Pro about five years ago, and there's never been anything like it. It generated stats like the Elias Sports Bureau and the gameplay was ahead of its time. Its features--career mode, MVP list, World Series history, Hall of Fame, etc.--made it a real fantasy league. Baseball 2001 has come closest to it, though it is still relatively far behind. The game is not full of bugs, unless you play it hard core all day, but not many people do or should. The Mogul technology is nice, but it really doesn't make me feel like I'm in control of my team. In managing finances, you use points. Why not cash? The oversimplification is an insult.

Not terrific, but good.

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 5 / 7
Date: June 01, 2000
Author: Amazon User

Microsoft Baseball 2001 is a pretty good baseball game but not what you might expect. The graphics are good the faces of the baseball players are fantastic but the commentary is horrible. Some of the stuff they say has no relation to what's happening in the baseball game.

To me Microsoft Baseball 2001 lacks on giving the baseball felling that other baseball games do.

Its straight

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 6 / 10
Date: May 12, 2000
Author: Amazon User

When I buy a baseball video game, I look for it to be challenging on its hardest level, if it doesnt do that for me, I won't play the game too much. I recently played this game when I was at my friends house and I must say it was somewhat of a challenge, maybe because i don't play too much computer baseball. Ive always played it on actual video game systems. What I thought was unique was the fact that you can call up actual AAA players. I have not seen that in other video games, at least for video game systems. Yes, the game will freeze during points and it gets annoying but that happens in a lot of computer video games. I must admit, I've never seen a home run derby when the batter gets 1000 outs. I certainly hope this game stays challenging because when I had MLB 2000 for playstation I was blowing out teams by 20+ runs every game on the hardest level and it just got really boring. Personally I liked the game a lot more because there was a Red Sox player on the cover of it (Nomar), and I am a big Red Sox fan.

Overall this game is worth the price it sells for. If your going to play a lot of games in a row, make the limit at about 4-5 games or you might get sick of it, like any other video game.

Good Game

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 4 / 5
Date: June 16, 2001
Author: Amazon User

This game is fairly good. The graphics are good and the gameplay is fun. The problem with it though is it's too easy. I've pitched 5 perfect games one by denny neagle agansit the yankees and another a 10 inning perfect game by pedro martinez. I've also beaten the computer is the all-star mode 14-1. Another thing is that if you play multiple seasons with one team, it gets very tiring because the all the games are the same each year. Also the rosters are very behind and are hard to personally update. All in all though it is a good game. 4 stars to Microsoft Baseball 2001

The perfect game for the true baseball fan

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 4 / 5
Date: July 29, 2001
Author: Amazon User

If you're anything like me, which means you follow baseball obsessively, charting stats, second guessing the general manager, etc., then you want this game on your PC. The graphics are sub-par, but the game far exceeds the competition in the team-building function. You can build your team with free agent signings, trades and minor league call-ups, possibly landing in the World Series. You can also simulate games and entire seasons, testing your roster against the rest of the league.

Bottom line: If you're looking for the best graphics and the smoothest gameplay, check out another option. But, if you are more interested in the game behind the game, give Microsoft Baseball a spin.

"Take me out to the PC ball game . . ."

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 3 / 3
Date: November 27, 2001
Author: Amazon User

Microsoft Baseball 2001 is a pretty good effort. Not great, not spectacular, but this game holds up very well on its own.

The one thing I find the most fun about this game is the Homerun Derby. This is a lot of fun to play, although not all the heavy hitters are able to hit homeruns. I have never been able to get Mark McGwire to hit more than just a few homeruns in the contest, for example. Maybe it has to do with his batting stance; the computerized version of Big Mac has him in a full squat as compared to the real life Big Mac who just bends a little at the knees.

Another thing that is nice is that it's not complicated to play. You don't have to decide what angle you're going to swing, what bat speed, etc. Those looking for a challenge might be disappointed, but those looking to have fun with the game won't be.

About the only thing that sticks out in my mind are the player graphics, which I hate to gripe about because I usually don't care about such petty things. But for all the effort the creators took in making the faces of the players look real, the rest of the body of the players don't. Just one look at the hands waving the bat behind the shoulders should be example enough. Other than that, things are great. The stadiums are fully reconstructed and look fabulous. Add to that the play-by-play commentary by Tom Brenamen and the live atmosphere of feeling like you're in the actual ballpark, and you have a sharp-looking game.

As I said earlier, Microsoft Baseball 2001 is a pretty good effort. Let's hope the makers can keep improving the look of it with future Microsoft Baseball releases.

Review Page: 1 2 Next 

Actions