User Reviews (1 - 11 of 58)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

Lots of fun

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: December 19, 2007
Author: Amazon User

I don't play that much but I got really hooked by this game. I enjoyed it a lot; I couldn't wait to get home from work to play. As usual, the second time around in the medium level was even more fun to play. Great graphics. Awesome and very elaborated architecture (not only the game's but the scenario's!).

MOH has Improved1

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: December 27, 2007
Author: Amazon User

MOH games on PC and PS2 have been quite lackluster since "Frontline"; but this game has really impressed me with the much improved graphics, reaching the level of Activision's Call of Duty series.
The concept is well recieved, but I still do not go for the idea of keeping stats for head shots etc; along with the idea that every mission has certain quotas to meet as far as medals and badges are concerned; This I believe can be eliminated as far as I am concerned.
As missions progress, the enemies are more difficult to "eliminate", at times taking a full clip from an automatic weapon before dropping, not to mention the "super human" enemies dressed in black! This takes away some of the realism with respect to weapon use.
I find the last mission VERY difficult to complete, I've reached the last part of it and having a heck of a time completing it, and I am on the "easy" mode!!....If you have patience...you will like this game!

Great fun on Mac

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: February 21, 2008
Author: Amazon User

I play this game on Windows Vista in Bootcamp on a MacBook Pro 2.4GHz, 4GB RAM, and it's great graphics, fluid motion, great sound, and just overall a lot of fun. I'd want to see what even less scripted action would mean and like some other reviewers have said, it's a bit short. But what I find is that when I play it again I try to look around as much as possible and I find lots of new areas to go to. It's a good step forward in the WWII genre and I look forward to the next title.

Great game

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: April 01, 2008
Author: Amazon User

I found the online multiplayer to be very lacking.
The single player is where it's at for this one.
This game is very "open", meaning you can land almost anywhere on the map for each level.You have objectives, but most of them can be completed in any order.The friendly NPC's are quite "intelligent".So is the enemy.
Sniping is a load of fun.Running amuck shooting everything will get you killed fast, so work with your NPC team.

a great gaming experience

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: June 04, 2008
Author: Amazon User

MoH A starts a bit slow, the interface is amateurish and EA's website wants you to pay for the soundtrack (in yer dreams), but you know the core game is fantastic. Programmers managed to create a punishing yet fair health system and the difficulty level is just right bringing you back to parachuting in different areas of the map as you try to accomplish your duty. Sure you need to download patches to fix the game but it's worth it- the final mission is a sheer delight (I have that tower in my nightmares) and the closure is satisfying. I had more fun with MoH A than COD4. Note: I don't care about multiplayer action so not sure how that rates here.

Medal of Honor stepped up... but just a little...

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: June 22, 2008
Author: Amazon User

Okay, so the saga of 'Medal of Honor' hasn't been that great, but I have to admit that 'Airborne' has hit hard compared to great first person shooters today.

One appealing aspect of the game is graphics, 'MOH' has pushed its gaming graphics to the highest standard in gaming, although the menu was a little cheap but the gaming overall surprised me.
The story-line is the same as usual; you are a soldier during the World War, and you are writing about your experience in the line of duty. The story-line does make sense, so I have no complaints on that.

Now onto the finer details:
If you have read a history book lately, you'll realize that the context created within the game is totally out of proportion, but then again, who doesn't like to create a nice "challenging" game?
What's worse is that 'MOH' expected the gamer to fight off of these different soldiers under leveled hierarchies as you move onto the next mission. Not only we are following a story line, but it seems to me that the story line is following these extremely unnecessary targets which is so out of proportion that this redundancy tends to get out of hand.

Another disappointment is that the game didn't have an introductory video to the game, it simply led the game straight to the menu, and even the menu became all tacky, but 'MOH' has always done that.

What truly made me infuriated is the checkpoints, and no "quicksave". Most games today are using quicksaves so that way it's more gamer friendly, unfortunately, 'Airborne' disallowed that with limited checkpoints available. I'm sorry EA but I hope you know that once a person dies in the game, and happening to know that he or she have to start all the way from the beginning kind of makes me want to throw the game in the trash. To be honest, it's not worth playing from the beginning again.

On to the positive pieces, I like the awards you get, like the weapon awards where you'll receive a faster reload, or less recoil, etc. which gives the game its uniqueness and the ability for the gamer to keep playing the missions until he/she completely finishes the game with the awards. But like I said, with no "quicksave" I wouldn't even want to go back and do it all over again.

Aside from all of this, I would say that the game is pretty much a nicer version of 'Wolfenstein' with the different crazy looking soldiers.
And of course, under the line of 'Call Of Duty', it still beats 'Airborne'. Even the first 'Call of Duty' game is more appealing than this and its graphics aren't that amazing.

So it's just to show you, that graphics aren't the only things that makes a game great.
For example, take a look at 'Splinter Cell's' 'Double Agent' game and compare to all the other 'Splinter Cell' games. You'll see what I mean.

top fun & joy

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: July 05, 2008
Author: Amazon User

Excelent piece of work of entertainment, highly recomended, not as large as i expect but great work anyway.

LAME

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: July 15, 2008
Author: Amazon User

Don't buy this game. You can't save except at checkpoints, so when you are killed, you have to play through almost the whole thing again just to get back to where you were. Even a head shot with an M1 Garand does not drop the enemy, COME ON!!!! The enemy soldiers have superhuman reflexes and can duck as soon as you pull the trigger. This game is boring and you feel like you are fighting with a pea shooter for all damage you can do to your enemy. First person shooters need to find another war to fight, (Korea would be cool) We have won World War Two too many times now.

Great Game!

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: July 17, 2008
Author: Amazon User

Fantastic game with great graphics and intense action. Much better than other recent WWII games. A must have!

Awesome

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: August 15, 2008
Author: Amazon User

Game is Excellent but to Bad Shipping was Ridiculely High!!!!!! For the Price with Shipping I could have Gone To Wal-Mart or Target and Paid the Same!!!

Review Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next 

Actions