User Reviews (1 - 11 of 58)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

I Can't believe I waited months for this!

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 8 / 14
Date: October 01, 2007
Author: Amazon User

I have waited for this oft delayed game for many moons. I would check the gaming sites for the latest news about a release date. I pre-ordered to get it sooner. What a disappointment! EA really dropped the ball on this one. I didn't think they could make a game worse than "Pacific Assault" but they did. It runs like crap on my computer that has a Pentium 4 duo-core, 2 full megs of RAM and a brand new GeForce 8600 GTS card. I set the video card and game to the lowest levels and it plays passably. I can't tell if the gameplay just sucks or if it's just running like crap. It looks like hell on these settings.
The Game will not save checkpoints-My control settings mysteriously switch themselves around-I have not even been through ten minutes of the first level before I'm fiddling with the settings trying to squeeze some performance from the game-or I give up in frustration.
Save your money-EA laid a rotten egg on this one

life should not be this difficult for a game

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 4 / 12
Date: September 18, 2007
Author: Amazon User

I am currently in the process of downloading any EA updates. Unfortunately, like most of the world, I have dial-up, as DSL is still not economically viable for my area.

OK, after 10 min, I see EA does not have any downloads for my extremely choppy gameplay (Windows XP, 3Ghz, 1 GB RAM, 80 GB free hard drive, ATI Radeon X1300 Pro, 16x (or higher- I will not bother to look it up) DVD.
All specified requirements for this game. I now see it requires a Pixel Shrader 3.0 support video. Man, that's BS, if that is the problem.

I do not understand why EA products are so finicky, and do not run on a computer I specified 9 months ago to play games. Buy Call of Duty, any version. Activision knows how to do it properly. EA is just a pain in the a.....

And is currently a waste of money for me. Anyone want to buy my copy for $[...]? ($[...] savings)

Empty CD case (CORRECTED by Amazon)

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 12
Date: September 16, 2007
Author: Amazon User

Was very excited to play this game so I pre-ordered it. The box finally arrives and I open it up to find out that the CD-case was empty. SO now I have to wait to return it and get a new one.

This Sucks.

I know it's not Amazons fault, but I hope not too many other people get the same dissapointment as I did.

--

UPDATE

Amazon just contacted me to tell me they have already shipped me a replacement free of charge. Now THAT is what I call great customer service! Thanks Amazon, you just won a customer for life.

Not much value

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 10 / 25
Date: September 14, 2007
Author: Amazon User

This game is already dropping in price, the first time I've seen a FPS drop this quick.
The why is simple it just doesn't deliver on any level.
Bots are dumb as dirt. MP maps are small and dark. If you fire you show up on radar and if you kill an opponent he sees a video of your firing spot and he re spawns and comes after you in seconds. with no VOIP your totally out of comm with your teammates. Clanners using Teamspeak or Vent win over, and over, and over. Not much fun.
MP browser is the worst I've ever seen. Long, long, wait for browser to finish a refresh and you can't use browser until done. Lots of servers listed, but no players on them. Filters don't function. I installed the patch but didn't address any of the problems.
An OK first time shooter for kids, but no adult interest.
Very pretty, if you have high end graphics. Cpu intensive.

trouble getting started

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 9
Date: September 22, 2007
Author: Amazon User

i preordered MOH Airborne, and am trying to run it on Vista on a 6 month old Dell, 1.5gRAM and NVIDIA G7300GS. game works well until you leave the aircraft, then you start rotating counterclockwise and can't stop, even after hitting the ground, even with video and sound turned down. all the other MOH games have worked well. does anyone have any intelligent suggestions??

Medal Of Honor Airborne Game needs new game card

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 5 / 24
Date: October 20, 2007
Author: Amazon User

I purchased this game for my husband, he loved the other games! I was disappointed to find that I needed to purchase an upgraded game card for his PC before he could play it, (he already has a high end card). He hasn't been able to play it yet, so I can't comment on the game itself.

Have we not learned anything?

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 4 / 16
Date: October 29, 2007
Author: Amazon User

Sorry to rant but I hope this is a helpful rant. Have we not learned anything from the past? I wont buy EA games anymore because they simply don't care about what they put into a game anymore, all they care about is pumping out as many games as they can so they can make a quick buck and its seems to have worked. Now I've enjoyed past MOH games but when Call of Duty came out I stopped playing them. I decided to give them another shot and I bought MOH Pacific Assault. I was very upset with it so then I thought well maybe they got it right with Airborne but then I remember about past EA games I bought.

I have EA NHL 07 and I was also kinda disappointed with it. The game is fun but lacks some of the basic things like when I score a goal you can hear crowd goes nuts but the people in the background do nothing and it kinda takes away some of the fun. The people who bought this game were screaming on the forums for updates and actually came up with some great ideas but EA doesn't care they were working on and came out with NHL 08.

EA could care less about the quality of the games they come out with. Now I haven't played Airborne but reading other peoples reviews tells me the same old crap is still happening and I advise you to stop wasting your money on EA games.

Thank you

airborne medal of honor

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 5
Date: December 08, 2007
Author: Amazon User

this game is garbage,if you base it on 82nd airborne combat jumps in wwII.
the only thing that is historically correct are the name's of the combat jumps. the rest is all wrong, the locations of the jumps, the 82nd did not jump into towns and cities that looked like factories. brothers in arms is a much more accurate game when it come down to history.. maybe EA can do a better job next time ..

Not worth the trouble

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 2
Date: January 15, 2008
Author: Amazon User

I have all "call of duty" games, Doom3, Band of Brothers and many more. NO PROBLEMS playing these games at all. This one? Well let just say whoever designed this one must of wanted to create a game for pc gurus because it takes a lot work to make it play. When I say work this is just look at a game which is not smooth.....Ho well too bad, I was looking forward to play it.

The WWII franchise is over and this is the nail in the coffin!

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 6
Date: January 31, 2008
Author: Amazon User

Hmm, where to begin. The graphics are incredibly awful, the so called drop where you want zones are geared in a way that you literally have only a small area to work with in landing.

So either you land on a building, close to the building or close to the smoke of the drop zone. Oh boy.

The ammo is scarce and the AI borders on mentally handicapped.

Your squad members are as useless as you are left wondering why they are even there other than to yell your name over and over and have you go in and clear all of the enemies out. Ridiculous, why have them? It is supposed to be a team, not one man and a glee club!

The enemy AI is either incredibly accurate and never miss, or they have no business holding weapons.

The recoil on the weapons is ridiculously flawed and the whole game feels like it was built on a good idea and pathetic production.

It is as if they got bored and decided to just throw it out to see if they could get some quick cash.

The only way to check your mission stats is to hit the escape key, it is just a stupid, stupid, stupid game.

The WWII franchise is played to death and overdone and EA is just showing just how pathetically bad they are at anything other than sports.

They screwed up Crysis, they screwed up Stalker, I mean is there anything EA can do right? Oh yeah, NBA or some other football type game...

The game sucks, EA sucks, just horrible and a waste of time.

Not too mention the game is 6 hours for 50 bucks? Is this the level of games now? Is this what these producers and developers are spending all this time making?

Gaming is starting to die in favor of going on-line for stupid multiplayer games that amount to a bunch of teenagers and 12 year olds using big boy words and cheating to have what they call fun.

This game sucks...

Review Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next 

Actions